Marine Biofouling: A Sticky Situation with Global Implications

Marine biofouling is the undesirable accumulation of microorganisms, plants, algae, arthropods, or mollusks to a surface when it is in contact with water for a period of time. The most common locations for biofouling are on ship hulls and propellers. When marine fouling organisms accumulate in these areas, if left untreated, a rough surface area is created that increases drag and deteriorates maneuverability. The drag that results is noteworthy because it escalates a ship’s fuel consumption, in some cases by forty percent, and contributes to the output of greenhouse gases.

One method to treat biofouling is scraping the affected surface to release the offending organisms. This approach addresses the problem only temporarily and, if not conducted responsibly, contributes to the global problem of transporting non-native species. Newly introduced organisms from other regions can compete with native species for resources, threaten the viability of fisheries or aquaculture, and/or introduce aquatic diseases or harmful algae. The percentage of non-native coastal marine species likely attributed to ship fouling is between forty and sixty percent. Scraping fouling organisms off affected surfaces before leaving port, while disposing of them away from water bodies, is imperative to preventing the future transport of non-native species.


Encouraging the use of environmentally friendly coating products is crucial to maintaining and protecting our valuable oceans.


The most widely accepted method to prevent biofouling is the use of antifouling coatings. Tin-based coatings were effective, but were later determined to be toxic, not only to fouling organisms, but also to other non-target organisms. Concentrations of tin-based coating toxins were found to build in places with heavy boat traffic and limited water circulation to the point where they could harm or destroy mollusk populations by interfering with their growth, reproduction and immunity processes on a cellular level. To address these global environmental concerns, an international treaty signed in 2002 banned the application of paint containing tin on all ships by January 1, 2003 and prohibiting the presence of tin-based antifouling coatings on all ships by January 1, 2008. Since the ban, mariners have turned to coatings with high concentrations of copper or zinc. Although they are not restricted under the law, copper- and zinc-based coatings are suspected to also cause cellular damage to non-target organisms. There are lesser known, more environmentally friendly alternatives to copper- and zinc-based antifouling coatings available, however; some of which photo-chemically produce hydrogen peroxide on the hull’s surface to create a protective barrier. Other products with limited negative environmental impacts like Teflon®, silicone, and wax curb fouling organism adhesion. Educating mariners about the existence of these safer coating products and encouraging their use is crucial to maintain and protect our valuable oceans.

Another strategy to decrease biofouling focuses on the design of places nautical vessels are housed. Enclosed marinas (.pdf) with more than two hundred boats have limited tide and current activity and are much more likely to contain fouling organisms than unenclosed marinas with less than two hundred boats. Marinas must be developed with input from planners, environmental engineers, and scientists to effectively maximize flushing capacity, thereby minimizing the concentration of marine fouling organisms and boating related contaminants.

Editor’s Note: Guest blogger koppenhe [at] email [dot] unc [dot] edu (Kathleen D. Oppenheimer) is a second-year student at the UNC School of Law, pursuing a dual Master of City and Regional Planning degree. See more of her photos of biofouling here.

Comments

Marine Bio-Fouling research at UNC

Kathleen,

Professor Joe DeSimone in the chemistry department at UNC is researching this area (http://www.chem.unc.edu/people/faculty/desimone/group/research_materials...). One problem with Teflon is that perfluoro-octanoic acid can leach out over time (http://www.pfoa.com/). To the best of my knowledge, PFOA bio-accumulates, but there aren't any known health effects. Prof Desimone's method involves a material that is similar to teflon, but doesn't use PFOA in the processing. I Just thought I would pass this along for your general knowledge.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readble fashion or (if JavaScript is enabled) replaced with a spamproof clickable link.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

Sign-in via ONYEN