Online Edition Articles - Biotechnology

Recent Development: Markovich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services: An Ounce of Cure for a Pound of Prevention

NC JOLT Online Edition, Volume 10, Page 59 (January 2009)

Abstract

There’s an old saying that “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” Vaccinations seem to exemplify this, allowing people to avoid diseases entirely by submitting to a simple injection, rather than forcing them to worry about the more difficult alternative of treating the disease once it is contracted. Markovich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services is a case in which an infant suffered severe injuries resulting from a vaccination. To address such rare situations, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act establishes a system through which injured parties may recover medical costs from the government. This Recent Development examines a failure of that system to serve its intended purpose. It looks at ways in which the court’s decision in Markovich runs counter to the policies underlying the creation of the system. It also considers the court’s erroneous interpretation of statutory language and the injustice of denying compensation to infants injured by vaccines that results from this misapplication. Markovich illustrates how the few children injured by vaccines may be offered precious little financial restitution for the unintended consequence of a technology that keeps the rest of us healthy.

Full Article Text

Cite as: J. Hunter Appler, Recent Development, Markovich v. Secretary of Health and Human Services: An Ounce of Cure for a Pound of Prevention, 10 N.C. J.L. & Tech. On. 59 (2009), http://cite.ncjolt.org/10NCJOLTOnlineEd59.

Subject Areas:

Recent Development: Running Down a Dream: Oscar Pistorius, Prosthetic Devices, and the Unknown Future of Athletes with Disabilities in the Olympic Games

NC JOLT Online Edition, Volume 10, Page 16 (November 2008)

Abstract

Oscar Pistorius, a double-amputee sprinter set on competing in the Olympic Games, was banned from competition by the International Association of Athletics Federation (“IAAF”) after it found his prosthetic legs gave him an unfair advantage over other runners. On appeal, the Court of Arbitration for Sport held that Pistorius had no such advantage, but the court’s ruling was limited only to Pistorius and his specific prosthesis. This Recent Development describes how the court’s ruling imposes substantial burdens on both athletes with disabilities and the IAAF. This Recent Development also discusses why the IAAF is not in the best position to enforce the ruling, and it enumerates remedies the IAAF can implement to resolve eligibility questions when evaluating athletes with disabilities.

Full Article Text

Cite as: Alexis Chappell, Recent Development, Running Down a Dream: Oscar Pistorius, Prosthetic Devices, and the Unknown Future of Athletes with Disabilities in the Olympic Games, 10 N.C. J.L. & Tech. On. 16 (2008), http://cite.ncjolt.org/10NCJOLTOnlineEd16.

Subject Areas:

Article: Plan B: The Alternative Not Available to All Females

NC JOLT Online Edition, Volume 8, Page 17 (February 2007)

Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article Text

Cite as: Giovanni Seawood, Article, Plan B: The Alternative Not Available to All Females , 8 N.C. J.L. & Tech. On. 17 (2007), http://cite.ncjolt.org/8NCJOLTOnlineEd17.

Subject Areas:

Articles by Category

 

Online Edition Volumes

 

User login

Sign-in via ONYEN